Totalism & Group Dynamics
Studies have shown that today's cults use a stronger form of control than
those of 50 years ago. The advent of new psychological experiments in the 60's
and 70's have produced the modern methods of mind control which are far more
sophisticated than the BEHAVIOUR MODIFICATION TECHNIQUES and THOUGHT REFORM
developed by the Chinese. To understand mind control you need a basic
understanding of BEHAVIOUR MODIFICATION TECHNIQUES.
What is "behaviour modification."
Simply described, it is "reward or punishment for actions" association. It
was used on you as a child whenever you were being commended or otherwise for
your behaviour.
Taking away a privilege is usually a sure-fire method to persuading a child
to change its behaviour when that child is old enough to under- stand the
process. Praising a child for doing good is another method of changing
behaviour, especially in the child who is anxious toplease. The rod of education
applied to the seat of learning is another method of bringing about a desired
behaviour change.
When behaviour modification techniques such as these are applied in a loving,
caring and consistent way, the child changes their behaviour without holding
feelings of resentment. However, if these techniques are perverted in any way,
damage is done to the child's psyche, their emotions. e.g.. the abused child
syndrome. Cults use a sophisticated and perverted form of behaviour modification
which damages an individuals emotions.
COGNITIVE DISSONANCELeon Festinger is a psychologist who
studied groups that predicted the end of the world. He found that most members
became stronger than ever when the prophecy failed. His investigation revealed
that members had to find a way to cope psychologically with the failure. They
needed to maintain order and meaning in their life. They needed to think they
were acting according to their self-image and values. Festinger described this
contradiction which they had to overcome as what has become known as the
"COGNITIVE DISSONANCE THEORY." The three components he described are:
"CONTROL OF BEHAVIOUR" - "CONTROL OF THOUGHTS" - "CONTROL OF EMOTIONS"
Each component has a powerful effect on the other two: CHANGE ONE AND THE
OTHERS WILL TEND TO FOLLOW. When all three change the individual undergoes a
complete change. Festinger summarised the basic principle:
"If you change a person's behaviour, his thoughts and feelings
will change to minimise the dissonance."
When there is a conflict between thoughts, feelings or behaviour, then those
in conflict will change to minimise the contradiction. This is because a person
can only tolerate a certain amount of discrepancy between these components which
make up his identity. In cults this dissonance is created to exploit and control
them.
Steven Hassan, author of Combating Cult Mind Control, added a fourth
component to Festinger's:
"CONTROL OF INFORMATION"
By controlling the information one receives you can control and restrict the
individual's ability to think for himself. You limit what he is able to think
about.
BEHAVIOUR CONTROL - The control of an individual's physical reality.
This can include control of where he lives, what he eats, his clothing,
sleep, job, rituals etc. This is why most cults have a stringent schedule for
members. There is always something to do in destructive cults. Each cult has its
own distinctive set of behaviours that bind it together. This control is so
powerful that the cult member will actually participate in their own punishment
and come to believe he actually deserves it! No one can command a person's
thoughts but IF YOU CAN CONTROL BEHAVIOUR THEN HEARTS AND MINDS WILL FOLLOW.
THOUGHT CONTROL - The control of an individual's thought processes
The indoctrination of members so thoroughly that they will manipulate their
own thought processes. The ideology is internalised as "the truth". Incoming
information is filtered through the beliefs which also regulates how this
information is thought about.
The cult has it's own language which further regulates how a person thinks.
This puts a great barrier between cult members and outsiders.
Another form of control is "thought stopping" techniques. This can take many
forms: chanting, meditating, singing, humming, tongues (some even pay money to
learn it), concentrated praying, etc. The use of these techniques short-circuits
the persons' ability to test reality. The person can only think positive
thoughts about the group. If there is a problem the member assumes
responsibility and works harder.
EMOTIONAL CONTROL - The control of the individuals emotional life
This manipulates a person's range of feelings. Guilt and fear are used to
keep control. Cult members cannot see the control by guilt and like other abuse
victims are conditioned to blame themselves when things are wrong, even grateful
when a leader points our their transgressions.
Fear is used to manipulate two ways. The first is to create an outside enemy
(we vs them) who is persecuting you. The second is the fear of punishment by the
leaders if you are not "good enough." Being "good enough" is following the
ideology perfectly. The most powerful emotional control is phobia
indoctrination. This can give the person a panic reaction at the very thought of
leaving the group. It is almost impossible to conceive that there is any life
outside the group. There is no physical gun held to their heads but the
psychological gun is just as if not more powerful.
INFORMATION CONTROL - The control of the individuals information sources
Deny a person the information needed to make a sound judgment and he will be
incapable of doing so. People are trapped in cults because they are denied both
the access to the critical information they need to assess their situation. The
psychological chains on their minds are just as powerful as if they were locked
away physically from society. So strong is this psychological process they also
lack the properly functioning internal mechanism to process any critical
information placed in front of them.
THE EIGHT MARKS OF MIND CONTROL TOTALISM - ALL OR
NOTHING
Mind Control is a PROCESS of eradicating former beliefs and
instituting new beliefs in their place through the use of COERCIVE persuasion.
It is a PROCESS which is designed to break a person's independence and
individuality and replace it with the ideology clone. The Chinese called this
process "thought reform" which was poorly translated into English as
"brain-washing".
BRAIN-WASHING
Brain-washing is now considered to be a different process to thought reform
or mind control. In brain-washing the victim knows who is the enemy. An example
is American Patty Hearst who was kidnapped by a terrorist group. Through
physical abuse she finally became a member of the group and took part in
terrorist activities and bank robberies.
THOUGHT CONTROL
Thought control is more subtle. The victim doesn't know who is the enemy
because the enemy seems like their best friend who only has their best interests
at heart.
Cults practice a more refined form of thought control than that used by the
Chinese. Leading psychologist, Dr Margaret Singer, said cults do it better than
the Chinese because it is easier to get people to do what you want through
manipulating them with guilt and anxiety. During this process the prospective
recruit is re-educated and will abandon the precepts he has learnt from life for
the "truth" or "enlightenment" offered by the group. In some cults this is done
over a long period of time; Other cults can bring about this change within 48
hours. Whichever way the process takes place the results are the same. The
individual has undergone a total change in personality and is often
unrecognisable by their family.
The process of thought control has been documented by Robert J Lifton who
researched what happened to the American prisoners of the Communist Chinese. He
labelled the steps which have become the standard by which to judge whether a
group is using "brain-washing" or "thought reform" on it's recruits.
Robert J Lifton's research showed that -
"These criteria consist of eight psychological themes which are
predominant within the social field of the thought reform milieu. Each has a
totalistic quality; each depends upon an equally absolute philosophical
assumption; and each mobilises certain individual emotional tendencies, mostly
of a polarising nature. Psychological theme, philosophical rationale, and
polarised individual tendencies are interdependent; they require, rather than
directly cause, each other. In combination they create an atmosphere which may
temporarily energise or exhilarate, but which at the same time poses the
gravest of human threats." (Thought Reform & the
Psychology of Totalism p 420)
The eight marks noted by Lifton are:
- MILIEU CONTROL - Control of the Environment and Communication
The control of human communication is the most basic feature of the thought
reform environment. This is the control of what the individual sees, hears,
reads, writes, experiences and expresses. It goes even further than that, and
controls the individuals communication with himself - his own thoughts.
Everything other than their beliefs is excluded. The organisation appears
to be omniscient. They seem to know everything that is going on. Reality is
their exclusive possession. In this environment the individual is deprived of
the combination of external information and internal reflection required to
test reality and to maintain a measure of identity separate from his
environment. The individual can feel victimised by his controllers and feel
the hostility of suffocation - the resentful awareness that his striving
toward new information, independent judgment and self-expression are being
thwarted.
EXAMPLE - Jehovah's Witnesses are a classical example of a closed community
living within and mixing with the wider community. Because they are so well
known we have used them as an example.
e.g. - In Jehovah's Witnesses
- You could "go beyond the 'truth' - beyond what they taught. This showed
you were thinking for yourself and put yourself above leadership. Those
moving ahead of the Organisation are counselled
- No gatherings other than those allowed or organised by organisation
(1982).
- Not making comments from your own thoughts at the meetings. Only
comments from the study articles are permitted. No independent thinking is
permitted.
- The organization always seemed to know what was going on in your
congregation and article appeared in Watchtower publications just at the
right time ("food at the proper time"). This was done through Circuit
Servants reports to Headquarters.
- Use of 'publisher record cards' etc. to monitor activities of members.
Watchtower is aware of trends etc. by strict reporting and control of
individual Witnesses activities.
- Report on fellow brothers & sisters (cannot get away from
organisation)
- Monitoring or observation of disfellowshipped or marked people.
- Non Witnesses are viewed as 'bad association'
- Worldly education discouraged - better to go door-to-door
- Employment that takes up time which should be devoted to Watchtower
activities is also discouraged.
- Should be 'buying out the opportune time' in 'theocratic activities'.
- Taught to indoctrinate self!
- 'Shepherding' of those who fall behind.
- MYSTICAL MANIPULATION - The Mystique of the Organisation
This seeks to provoke specific patterns of behaviour and emotion in such a
way that these will appear to have arisen spontaneously from within the
environment. For the manipulated person this assumes a near-mystical quality.
This is not just a power trip by the manipulators. They have a sense of
"higher purpose" and see themselves as being the "keepers of the truth." By
becoming the instruments of their own mystique, they create a mystical aura
around the manipulating institution - the Party, the Government, the
Organisation, etc. They are the chosen agents to carry out this mystical
imperative.
The pursuit of this mystical imperative supersedes all considerations of
decency of immediate human welfare. The end justifies the means. You can lie,
deceive or whatever to those outside the organiz- ation. Association with the
"outside" is only to benefit their own cause in some way. Some cults like
Moonies and Hare Krishna's call their deception "heavenly deception" or
"transcendental trickery". Members believe in the ideology to such a degree
that they rationalize these deceptions. Members are kept in a frenzy of cult
related activities. There is little time or energy to think about their
lifestyle.
"The psychology of the pawn" - This person feels unable to escape from
forces he sees more powerful than himself. His way of dealing with this is to
adapt to them. He learns how to anticipate problems with the organisation and
to manipulate events to avoid incriminating himself. This is the person who
has been in the organisation long enough, knows something is wrong, is on the
verge of leaving then suddenly becomes very loyal. They sell out to the
organisation and will turn in friends who may have confided in them.
e.g. - In Jehovah's Witnesses
- "Theocratic strategy" - If you don't have a right to know the truth it
is OK to lie to you. (See "Insight" under 'Lie')
- Avoid telling prospects- No blood, holidays, family, friends, etc
- Bring someone new each time they call so prospect gets to know the
people at the Kingdom Hall when they attend. (Planned spontaneity)
- The ideology supersedes the welfare of the individual. They are not
involved in charities outside the group [or in the group].
- Not helping fellow memmbers to the detriment of promoting the ideology.
This is more important than helping the sick & elderly.
- Prayers are general - for the organisation not the needs of the
individual. See God as not interested in you as a person.
- Blessed only for effort in promoting the Kingdom.
- Ability of organisation to accomplish the 'preaching work' seen as
evidence of Jehovah's blessing, direction and angelic help
- Jehovah 'sifts out' those not truly 'in the truth', those without 'the
right heart condition' which is why people leave or must be
disfellowshipped. No one leaves legitimately.
- DEMAND FOR PURITY - Everything is black & white
Pure and impure is defined by the ideology of the organization. Only those
ideas, feelings and actions consistent with the ideology and policy are good.
The individual conscience is not reliable. The philosophical assumption is
that absolute purity is attainable and that anything done in the name of this
purity is moral. By defining and manipulating the criteria of purity and
conducting an all-out war on impurity (dissension especially) the organisation
creates a narrow world of guilt and shame. This is perpetuated by an ethos of
continuous reform, the demand that one strive permanently and painfully for
something which not only does not exist but is alien to the human condition.
Under these conditions the individual expects humiliation, ostracism and
punishment because of his inability to live up to the criteria and lives in a
constant state of guilt and shame. Since the organisation is the ultimate
judge of good and evil, this guilt and shame is used to manipulate and control
members. The organization becomes an authority without limit in the eyes of
members and their power is nowhere more evident that in their capacity to
"forgive".
All impurities are seen to originate from "outside" (the world). Therefore,
one of the best ways to relieve himself of the burden of guilt is to denounce
these with great hostility. The more guilty he feels, the greater his hatred,
the more hostile is his denouncement. Organizationally this eventually leads
to purges of heretics, mass hatred and religious holy wars. The group will
point to the mistakes of all other belief systems while promoting their own
purity. This gives the impression that their organisation is perfect, clean
and pure as a people or group.
e.g. - In Jehovah's Witnesses
- CULT OF CONFESSION - Reporting to leadership
This is closely related to the demand for purity. Confession is carried
beyond the ordinary religious, legal and therapeutic expressions to the point
of becoming a cult in itself. In totalist hands, confession becomes a means of
exploiting, rather than offering solace for these vulnerabilities.
Totalist confession is an act of self-surrender, the expression of the
merging of the individual and environment. There is a dissolution of self,
talents and money. Conformity.
The cult of confession has effects quite the reverse of its ideal of total
exposure; rather than eliminating personal secrets, it increases and
intensifies them.
The individual becomes caught up in continuous conflict over which secrets
to preserve and which to surrender, over ways to reveal lesser secrets can be
revealed and ways to protect more important ones.
The cult of confession makes it virtually impossible to attain reasonable
balance between worth and humility.
e.g. In Jehovah's Witnesses
- Confessing infringements to an Elder.
- Putting in field reports (test of spirituality) [A monthly report of
one's activities for that month. How many hours door-knocking; number of
books and magazines sold; number of people one studied doctrine with etc]
- Accept orders without question. Ask "How high" when told to jump.
- Any who are aware of another's sin must put this one in to the elders or
the guilt will rest on their shoulders.
- Congregation is made aware of the sin through talks and restrictions
placed on guilty ones.
- SACRED SCIENCE - Absolute "Truth"
Their "truth" is the absolute truth. It is sacred - beyond questioning.
There is a reverence demanded for the leadership. They have ALL the answers.
Only to them is given the revelation of "truth".
The ultimate moral vision becomes the ultimate science and the person who
dares to criticise it, or even think criticism, is immoral, irreverent and
"unscientific".
The assumption here is not so much that man can be God, but rather that
man's IDEAS can be God.
This gives sense of security to the member. They are confident they can get
the answer to the most difficult problem or question.
e.g. In Jehovah's Witnesses:
- You can be disfellowshipped (kicked out) for daring to question what is
taught in their publications.
- Watchtower demands full devotion of members. Must not question the
Organization (= questioning God)
- There is an answer to everything, if you cannot find it in the
publications you must 'wait on Jehovah' and not 'push ahead'.
- Organisation itself will survive Armageddon but individual Jehovah's
Witnesses have no such assurance.
- LOADING THE LANGUAGE - Thought terminating cliches
Everything is compressed into brief, highly reductive, definitive-sounding
phrases, easily memorised and easily expressed.
There are "good" terms which represents the groups ideology and "evil"
terms to represent everything outside which is to be rejected. Totalist
language is intensely divisive, all-encompassing jargon, unmercifully judging.
To those outside the group this language is tedious - the language of
non-thought.
This effectively isolates members from outside world. The only people who
understand you are other members. Other members can tell if you are really one
of them by how you talk.
This narrowness of the language is constricting. The individual is
linguistically deprived because language is central to the human experience
and his capacities for thinking and feeling are immensely restricted.
While initially this loaded language can give a sense of security to the
new believer, an uneasiness develops over time. This uneasiness may result in
a withdrawal into the system and he preaches even harder to hide his problem
and demonstrate his loyalty. It may also produce an inner division and the
individual will publicly give the right performance while privately have his
own thoughts.
Either way, his imagination becomes increasingly disassociated from his
actual life experiences and may even tend to atrophy from disuse.
e.g. - In Jehovah's Witnesses
- Theocratic strategy - "ark of salvation" - "new light" - "meat in due
season" - "faithful & discreet slave" - "apostate" - "The anointed" -
Book study - Christendom - "Christ Jesus" instead of "Jesus Christ" - 'back
calls' now called 'return visits' (terminology changes indicate who might be
falling behind or who is not really a member) - "Jehovah will take care of
it in his due time." - "It's the truth" - doesn't matter if they make a
mistake - Where else is there to go? - Worldly - Governing Body - New System
of Things
- DOCTRINE OVER PERSON - Doctrine supersedes human experience
The ideological myth merges with their "truth" and the resulting deduction
can be so overpowering and coercive that is simply replaces reality.
Consequently past events can be altered, rewritten or even ignored to make
them consistent with the current reality. This alteration is especially lethal
when the distortions are imposed on the individual's memory.
They demand character and identity of a person be reshaped to fit their
clone of mentality. The individual must fit the rigid contours of the
doctrinal mould instead of developing their own potential and personality.
The underlying assumption is that the doctrine - including its mythological
elements - is ultimately more valid, true and real than is any aspect of
actual human character or human experience. The individual under such pressure
is propelled into an intense conflict with his own sense of integrity, a
struggle which take place in relation to polarised feelings if sincerity and
insincerity.
Absolute sincerity is demanded by the group yet this must be put to one
side when changes take place the individual has to deny the original belief
ever existed. Personal feelings are suppressed and members must appear to be
contented and enthusiastic at all times.
Some cults believe that all illness is a result of lack of faith and
evidence of sin in your life. These things have to be prayed away and medical
attention is ignored as a "sign of faith."
e.g. - In Jehovah's Witnesses
- "There is no life outside the organisation" so when they see people who
have made a life outside they revert back to doctrine over what they see.
- If an experience doesn't fit, it must be demons.
- Will ignore needs of others because doctrine overrides human experience.
i.e. will ignore needs of disfellowshipped or marked persons no matter how
serious those needs are.
- Those who were JW's before 1975 and are still JW's will deny they ever
believed Armageddon was due that year - even those who sold homes, delayed
medical treatment etc.
- Watchtower has final authority even over personal experience. Blood
transfusions, etc. Conscience matters are discussed only in the light of
Watchtower doctrine (not left to individuals' consciences).
- DISPENSING OF EXISTENCE - Who is worthy to live
They have the right to decide who is worthy of life and who isn't. They
also decide which history books are accurate and which are not.
Those in the organisation are worthy of life; those outside worthy of
death. The outsiders can be permitted to live if they change and become an
insider. Members live in fear of being pronounced "dead". They have a fear of
annihilation or extinction. The emotional conflict is one of "being vs
nothingness".
Existence comes to depend upon creed (I believe, therefore I am), upon
mission (I obey, therefore I am) and beyond these, upon a sense of total
merger with the organisation. Should he stray from the "truth" his right to
exist may be withdrawn and he is pronounced "dead".
e.g. - In Jehovah's Witnesses
- "Sheep and goats" - how one responds to "Christ's brothers" decides
their future. ("Christ's brothers" are those who rule the organisation. How
you respond to their message as carried by their messengers decides your
eternal future).
- Elders decide who is worthy of life at Judicial Committee meetings.
- They decide who is worthy of a resurrection - (Sodom & Gommorah).
- Disfellowshiping 'sinners' denies them any hope for a future outside the
Organisation.
- They will blatently lie to achieve goals and consider this to be
"theocratic strategy".
- Any information contrary to the Watchtower 'system' is not considered
worth listening to or reading.
- Witnesses are forbidden to discuss such information, especially if is
considered 'apostate' [put together by former members]
IN SUMMARY
The more clearly these eight points are obvious, the
greater the resemblance to ideological totalism. The more an organisation
utilises such totalist devices to change individuals, the greater its
resemblance to thought reform.
Remember ..... A group does not have to be religious to be cultic in
behaviour. High demand groups can be commercial, political and psychological. Be
aware, especially if you are a bright, intelligent and idealistic person. The
most likely person to be caught up in this type of behavioural system is the one
who says "I won't get caught. It will never happen to me. I am too intelligent
for that sort of thing."
Written by Jan Groenveld Internet Address:
py101663@mailbox.uq.oz.au Fidonet Address : 3:640/316 (c) Cult Awareness
& Information Centre, PO Box 2444, Mansfield 4122, Australia May be
distributed freely providing it contains the above identifying information and
the text is not altered in any way.
E-mail Support Groups


<--RING SITE MAP-->

|